The Sequitoria (Under Development)

Sequiturum Dei Omnipotentem

IntroductionSurvivalOrganic CultureSchools of SequitoriaOrganic ExpressionSubjunctivismThe WarriorThe HunterThe BuilderThe LoverThe ArtistGroundednessBalanceCenterednessTimingTimelinesIntegrityPartner OrganizationsPlato's CaveatQuotes, Links & Readings

OrganicCulture-800a.jpg

Culture: The Flower of Man


If the mind of the first human functioned differently from his immediate predecessor, his thoughts were undoubtedly directed toward the same end: survival. To prehistoric man or “Man-in-the-Bush”, survival was everything. That meant he needed food (and water), some sort of shelter or clothing and the ability to defend himself. Those were things which dominated his thoughts – and even prior to his development of language (as such), those were the things which dominated his speech. Food, shelter, security … and of course, sex.

But if sex was in the back of his mind a lot, Man-in-the-Bush didn’t need sex to survive. The species did, but many species can survive quite well with only very occasional sexual activity - by only very few of its members. And considering humankind’s natural predisposition toward frequent sexual activity, amongst both sexes, the sex drive probably didn’t generate a lot of thought or planning. It probably did, however, even as it does today, generate considerable passion - and conflict, which was dealt with summarily.

Security also was less of a daily concern. Dangerous animals were a normal part of hunting, or could be avoided if their presence was known, but could not otherwise be easily controlled. Other tribes could be cooperated with, conquered or fled from when encountered, but constant war was a thing of the future. Conflict undoubtedly arose between members of a tribe, but once the dominant members had established their position, things settled down until an up-and-coming younger member challenged a superior in the status quo – death, exile or subservience, for one or the other, resulting in short order.

Shelter too, did not require much daily attention. Upon arrival to a new hunting ground, shelter could could be found or constructed with relative ease, but otherwise took little long-term thought, energy or communication.

So, up until the agricultural revolution of about 12,000 years ago, finding enough to eat and having access to water were the primary, daily concerns. Without water, life ends in a few days; without food, a few weeks, at most. With no prospect for either, all other conscious concerns slip by the wayside rather quickly. With nothing but food and water, however, life might continue for years, even decades. The need for sustenance is immediate, daily, and absolute. But the two go hand-in-hand. Where there is water, there is, almost always, food.

One of the differences between food and water is what can be done with them. Any particular food item, particularly amongst omnivores, is dispensible. Water, however, when it comes to survival, has almost no substitute. A human being may survive for some time on the liquid nutrients in plants, bushmen did it regularly, but that is an exception. On the other hand, the possible variations for the use and preparation of even a single food source are almost unlimited - well noted by Benjamin Buford "Bubba" Blue in his poetic tribute to shrimp.

For Man-in-the-Bush, water was the primary necessity, food secondary. The availability of food was more widespread, seasonal, and often mobile. He could follow the herds, fill his belly and supplement his diet with nuts, grains, fruits and vegetables found along the way. The herds themselves had the same, if less conscious, concerns. They were also always on the march, seeking greener pastures and fresh waters.

They met at the watering holes, where often, there was, and still is, conflict. The word "rival" has the same Latin root as the word "river". Even today, conflict over water rights is common, from municipalities reaching hundreds of miles into the surrounding countryside to beachfront communities limiting the access of outsiders, mankind fights over water. Today’s great cities, almost without exception, grew up around good ports, with deep waters and easy access to trade routes. In rural areas, it is estimated that up to a billion people still do not have access to clean water. Not much has changed; from prehistory through the advancement of civilization, the need and availability of water is, and always has been, critical.

From a broader perspective, wildlife still fight at watering holes; and beneath the earth, everywhere, plants fight, root against root, for water. Water is life.

Man-in-the-Bush, in his various tribal cultures, fought over access to water and would often stay until the water or food ran out. Chances are, if they didn't run out, he would stay. Some surely did. Others continued to follow the herds, as some do even today, though the herds have been domesticated. Most of those learned to settle somewhere near water and move their herds from pasture to pasture (instead of themselves) - still the most prevalent form of ranching today. Still others began, at some point, (where is of no significance), to sow and harvest. Thus began the agricultural revolution1.

The hunter/gatherer had become a fisherman, farmer or rancher.

With less time required for hunting and gathering, more time could be devoted to personal comfort and shelter. Man-in-the-Bush had long since worn skins to to protect his skin from the elements, rock & thorns. He already knew the basics of building, having regularly fashioned temporary structures. Now he began, in earnest, to refine his skills.

He still used thatch to cover huts where that was as much as was needed, but added timbers and mub or daub for strength, longevity and increased security. Where the winters were cold and the trees tall and straight he used logs, taking advantage of the workability, strength and insulating properties of timber. In desert areas, he uncovered the secrets of adobe, so efficient at soaking up the sun's rays during the long hot days and re-emitting that heat in the chill of the night.

Stone, however, had the permanence that became symbolic of the strength and stability of the civilizations which arose after the agricultural revolution. From what are now Zimbabwe to Peru to China to Egypt to England, stone was cut and shaped and patterned to represent not only the qualities inherent in it, but the inspirations and visions of the people.

So too did his clothing and furnishings become more more functional, more complex and more highly decorated. Skins were tanned into leather. Certain plants were discovered to have qualities inherent within them which allowed for the fabrication of cloth. Vegetable and mineral were processed into dies which were used to add color to garments.

Gradually, as the qualities hidden in the materials of the natural environment were unlocked, the man-made environment grew to reflect it. The uses, textures, colors and appearance of natural materials manifested themselves as forms of expression, the natural byproduct of function. Using creativity and imagination, Man-in-the-Bush, both stimulated and limited by his environment, had become a builder, craftsman and artist. Civilization began to take shape and differences in culture began to become recognizable.

Even as a forest is an outgrowth of its climate and geography, so too is culture. And as a flowering plant draws nutrients from the soil throughout the year, marshals its resources over the seasons, reaches for the sun and explodes finally in a personal display of color and scent, so does mankind, in his various cultures, celebrate life with an outburst of song and dance, of texture, form and color.

Culture is the flower of man.

_________________________________________________________________

Notes: 1) The Agricultural Revolution was as much a revolution in animal husbandry as it was in farming.


Wilderness is the raw material out of which man has hammered the artifact called civilization. Wilderness was never a homogenous raw material. It was very diverse. The differences in the product are known as cultures. The rich diversity of the world's cultures reflects a corresponding diversity in the wilds that gave them birth - Aldo Leopold

 Culture is usually defined by anthropologists in terms that distinguish it from nature, often as a radical contrast: culture versus nature. Steven Pinker - Human Universals

~ ~ ~

There is more to culture, of course, than the physical aspects described above. As cultures across the world began to manifest their relationship with their environment, they began to direct more attention to the relationships between people. At some point, (probably earlier), it was recognized that conflict wasn’t simply a fact of life that couldn’t be controlled, with the spoils going to the winner and without any sense of justice. The concepts of right and wrong began to take hold.

 

When, where, why, how and by whom this idea came into being will probably be debated for many years to come, but it did, and man, the hunter and builder became a lawmaker. Early laws covered almost everything included in modern jurisprudence; laws governing property and trade; fines and punishments for thievery and other crimes; laws about marriage and inheritance, and so on.

Anthropologists have normally always tried to make a distinction between culture and nature, on the premise that those aspects of human life which were "natural" were driven by instinct and not within the scope of anthropological study. On the other hand, "culture" was viewed as being almost entirely arbitrary. Donald Brown exposed this flaw in his book "Human Universals" and Steven Pinker picked up where Professor Brown left off in his work "The Blank Slate".  In it, he posits that this distinction has resulted in three broad views of life amongst, not only anthropologists, but academics in general:

1) That upon birth, the human mind is a "Blank Slate" (Tabula Rasa) which can be (or is) molded by society into whatever society deems most appropriate, or civilized at the time and that there is no underlying "human nature" which might limit or affect in any way, what kind of populace a society might create.

2) That man (or in this case "Man-in-the-Bush") is (or was originally), a "Noble Savage", who lived a generally peaceful, pastoral life in harmony with his natural surroundings  - and that it has been society or civilization which has corrupted him.

3) That there is a "Ghost in the Machine"; a soul, a spark of divine fire, a God who has directed or at least inspired man's behavior and development. In this regard, there seems to be a growing consensus, led by cognitive and neuro-sciences that it is the brain which directs much (some say all) of human behavior largely independently of the conscious mind. God they assert, is an illusion.

Clearly, the mind is not a blank slate. Indeed, the structure of the brain dictates that "Brain cells fire in patterns" (Pinker) but those patterns (and so, the underlying structure), developed to satisfy needs; the need for comfort, sustenance, security, sex and expression. In short, The Sequitoria.

Add text

 


Add Text